CAIDP calls on UK watchdog to uphold rights in AI governance

CAIDP submitted feedback to the UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) regarding the integration of individual rights into generative AI systems. In the detailed response, CAIDP addressed the urgent need for stringent regulatory measures to protect against the potential infringement of fundamental rights by AI technologies.

CAIDP emphasized the importance of establishing robust guardrails to ensure that AI systems do not violate individual rights. The Center stated, "We reiterate the criticality and urgency of the actions that ICO must undertake to set guardrails against AI systems that infringe upon the fundamental rights of the UK public. ICO must enact governance mechanisms to ensure that AI actors processing personal data treat people fairly, that systems are accountable, that adverse decisions are contestable and that transparency is meaningful.”In advocating for a framework that centers on human rights, CAIDP strongly advised the ICO to adopt the UNESCO Recommendations on the Ethics of AI.

Furthermore, CAIDP reiterated its objections to certain data collection practices, such as web scraping, which do not meet the legitimate interest provision of the lawful basis for personal data processing. The Center suggested that "ethical developers should assess alternative data sources or methods to achieve the same goal without using personal data without prior consent."

CAIDP also highlighted the necessity of minimizing the processing of personal data, consistent with the Data Minimization Principle, to protect the rights of data subjects. The Center pointed out the crucial role that Data Protection Authorities play in enforcing these principles, stating, "The UK GDPR provides a strong regulatory umbrella for privacy and data protection. Clear redress mechanisms and remedies must be in place to achieve accountability for the design, development, or deployment of AI systems that infringe upon individual rights."

The submission detailed the risks associated with AI systems, particularly those that are general-purpose and not designed with ethical considerations in mind. CAIDP noted, "AI systems should be human-centric, designed with justice, democratic values, and human rights at the core. General AI purpose systems pose multiple privacy risks, including loss of data confidentiality, lack of transparency, absence of control over how data is used. These risks are augmented when considering ethical impacts and human rights infringements."

Previous
Previous

Call for independent national market surveillance authorities under the AI Act

Next
Next

EU AI Office: a preliminary analysis